On 05/04/2023 21:47, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Extend the existing fan53555 driver to support the Rockchip RK860X
> regulators.
>
> RK8600/RK8601 are fully compatible with FAN53555 regulators.
>
> @@ -531,6 +634,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused fan53555_dt_ids[] = {
> }, {
> .compatible = "fcs,fan53555",
> .data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_FAIRCHILD
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk8600",
> + .data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk8601",
> + .data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk8602",
> + .data = (void *)RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk8603",
> + .data = (void *)RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> }, {
> .compatible = "silergy,syr827",
> .data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_SILERGY,
> @@ -637,6 +752,18 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id fan53555_id[] = {
> }, {
> .name = "fan53555",
> .driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_FAIRCHILD
> + }, {
> + .name = "rk8600",
> + .driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> + }, {
> + .name = "rk8601",
> + .driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
Why do you need this entry match data if it is the same as rk8600?
> + }, {
> + .name = "rk8602",
> + .driver_data = RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> + }, {
> + .name = "rk8603",
> + .driver_data = RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
Why do you need this entry match data if it is the same as rk8602?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
