Hi Linus, On Wed 2023-02-08 @ 04:01:05 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:07 PM Trevor Woerner <twoerner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But what about those lines that go out to general purpose headers such as > > the 40 pins of the Raspberry Pi header? Most SBCs have some set of header > > that's available to users to connect whatever devices they wish, many of > > them have adopted the rpi's 40-pin layout. > > I think using the names on the header is fine, what I didn't want to see > is things like the name of the pin on the SoC package or names made > up from kernel-internal software constructs. As long as it is something > real, and preferably unique I'm fine with it. > > One early example is the HiKey N96 board: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi3670-hikey970.dts Thank you for the clarification. Thinking from the user's point of view, I added the actual pin number, then the SoC name, then the pin's label. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230208014504.18899-1-twoerner@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u I'll send a v2 with just the pin's label. Would leaving the pin number, in addition to the name, be okay? Best regards, Trevor
