Re: [PATCH v8 5/9] dt-bindings: qcom-qce: document clocks and clock-names as optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/2023 17:16, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
On 2/2/23 16:21, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 02/02/2023 15:04, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,

On 2/2/23 15:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 02/02/2023 14:50, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>

On certain Snapdragon processors, the crypto engine clocks are enabled by
default by security firmware.

Then probably we should not require them only on these variants.

I don't have the exact list of the affected SoCs, I believe Neil can provide
such a list, if you find it crucial.

It's the case for SM8350, SM8450 & SM8550.


On SM8250 there is no QCE clocks also, so I'll add it to the list, and I hope
that now the list is complete.

It could be that the relevant platforms are the ones with 'qcom,no-clock-support'
property of QCE in the downstream.


Yes this is what I figured out with the 5.10 device-trees I have checkouted.

Neil




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux