Re: [PATCH 00/13] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/2023 17:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
> patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
> there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.
> 

This patchset will conflict with:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126230319.3977109-2-dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx/

In few places it actually re-does Dmitry's patch, so probably we should
both come with unified solution.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux