On 16/01/2023 10:16, Yong Wu (吴勇) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> There is little point in storing output of get_maintainers.pl >>>> forever >>>> in >>>> the git log. If you need it for some reason, please keep it after >>>> - >>>> --. >>> >>> I did get the list from get_maintainers.pl. Sorry that I didn't >>> differentiate. >> >> Getting the list from get_maintainers.pl is correct but storing it >> forever in git log is really unnecessary. It's not useful. It's just >> automated output, reproducible at any given time. > > This patchset crosses several domains. This patch is about vcodec, the > next one is about jpeg and the later ones are about iommu. > The reviewers may be different, thus I use "Cc:" here. is this OK in > this case? I guess we do not talk about the same thing. It does not matter that reviewers are different. They are all different. Please show me the direct benefit of storing automated output from a tool in Git log. > or I should remove this, and put all of them in the cc list > of the mail. I gave you the instruction at beginning, some mails ago... Best regards, Krzysztof
