On 26/10/2022 00:18, Hector Martin wrote: >>>> With the first one (t8103) - it's an enum. >>> >>> This is deliberate. t6000 is compatible with t8103, but t8112 is not >>> (though all are compatible with what the generic apple,cluster-cpufreq >>> compatible implies). >> >> I was not talking about t6000. I was talking about two entries - first >> and last - which should be just an enum. There is no compatibility, so >> what is here deliberate? To not make enum things which are an enum? > > Sorry, I didn't understand what you meant. You mean that the two entries > should be merged, with an enum for the first item listing both SoCs, right? Yes Best regards, Krzysztof
