On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 28.09.2022 18:23, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > >> On 28.09.2022 18:03, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote: > >>> > >>>> Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for > >>>> the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding > >>>> to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> v1 -> v2: > >>>> - use full schema paths > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> v2 -> v3: > >>>> - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> v3 -> v4: > >>>> - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> v4 -> v5: > >>>> - Nothing > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++--- > >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> Not sure how these can be handled. > >>> > >>> I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied. > >>> > >>> NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> The sama5d2-flexcom binding related patches are dependent on: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > I would be very cautious about relying on comments made in the > > cover-letter. Better to make this a hard requirement and place them > > in the same patch-set. > > > > > > Understood, my apologies, I will keep this in mind the next time this > happens :). > > Otherwise, by applying the patch series linked above, my sama5d2-flexcom > patches should apply cleanly afterwards. Please re-send this once the other set has been applied. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
