Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] drivers: remoteproc: Add Xilinx r5 remoteproc driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Mathieu.

Also, I see that last few revisions I have changed driver a lot based on comments, but documentation in driver is not in sync.

I know we agreed initially, that I will address changes _only_ commented in previous revision. However, in next revision I would like

to fix documentation all over the driver along with your comments. I hope it's fine and I wanted to give you heads up so we stay on same page.

Thanks,

Tanmay

On 9/29/22 10:22 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:02:22PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
On 9/1/22 1:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
[ ... ]
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Hi Mathieu,

I tried to fix SPDX-License-Identifier to GPL (same as MODULE_LICENSE
below), However checkpatch.pl reports this as following warning:

"WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL' is not supported in LICENSES/..."

I see that GPL-1.0 is under LICENSE/deprecated directory.

+/*
+ * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
[ ... ]

+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
+	.probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
+		.of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
+	},
+};
+module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
Also, changing to MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2") gives following warning:

WARNING: Prefer "GPL" over "GPL v2" - see commit bf7fbeeae6db ("module: Cure
the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity")
#1115: FILE: drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:1034:
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

So, It looks like SPDX-License-Identifier should be GPL-2.0-only and
MODULE_LICENSE should be change to "GPL".
Commit bf7fbeeae6db is an interesting read - thanks for pointing it out.

It this ok? Any other suggestions ?
What you have looks good, in that regard there is no need to change anything
from your patch.

Thanks,

Tanmay

More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.

Thanks,
Mathieu

--
2.25.1




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux