On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem
> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem
> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which
> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which
> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the
> result is different.
>
> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx
> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access
> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v9
> - replace devm_rproc_alloc with rproc_alloc
> - %s/until/while/r
> - remove extra line
> - %s/i > -1/i >=0/r fix this throughout the driver
> - fix type of tcm_mode from int to enum rpu_tcm_comb
> - release &child_pdev->dev references in case of failure
> - remove zynqmp_r5_core_exit()
> - undefined memory-region property isn't driver failure
> - remove tcm bank count check from ops
> - fix tcm bank turn-off sequence
> - fix parse_fw function documentation
> - do not use rproc_mem_entry_init on vdev0buffers
> - declare variabls in reverse xmas tree order throughout the driver
>
> Changes in v8:
> - None
>
> Changes in v7:
> - None
>
> Changes in v6:
> - None
>
> Changes in v5:
> - None
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Remove redundant header files
> - use dev_err_probe() to report errors during probe
> - Fix missing check on error code returned by zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
> - Fix memory leaks all over the driver when resource allocation fails for any core
> - make cluster mode check only at one place
> - remove redundant initialization of variable
> - remove redundant use of of_node_put()
> - Fix Comment format problem
> - Assign offset of zynqmp_tcm_banks instead of duplicating it
> - Add tcm and memory regions rproc carveouts during prepare instead of parse_fw
> - Remove rproc_mem_entry object from r5_core
> - Use put_device() and rproc_del() APIs to fix memory leaks
> - Replace pr_* with dev_*. This was missed in v3, fix now.
> - Use "GPL" instead of "GPL v2" in MODULE_LICENSE macro. This was suggested by checkpatch script.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix checkpatch script indentation warning
> - Remove unused variable from xilinx remoteproc driver
> - use C style comments, i.e /*...*/
> - Remove redundant debug information which can be derived using /proc/device-tree
> - Fix multilined comment format
> - s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM"
> - Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL.
> Remove redundant error check for this function throughout the driver.
> - Fix RPU mode configuration and add documentation accordingly
> - Get rid of the indentations to match function documentation style with rest of the driver
> - Fix memory leak by only using r5_rproc->priv and not replace it with new instance
> - Use 'i' for the outer loop and 'j' for the inner one as per convention
> - Remove redundant error and NULL checks throughout the driver
> - Use devm_kcalloc() when more than one element is required
> - Add memory-regions carveouts during driver probe instead of parse_fw call
> This removes redundant copy of reserved_mem object in r5_core structure.
> - Fix memory leak by using of_node_put()
> - Fix indentation of tcm_mem_map function args
> - Remove redundant init of variables
> - Initialize tcm bank size variable for lockstep mode
> - Replace u32 with phys_addr_t for variable stroing memory bank address
> - Add documentation of TCM behavior in lockstep mode
> - Use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform driver API
> - Remove info level messages
> - Fix checkpatch.pl warnings
> - Add documentation for the Xilinx r5f platform to understand driver design
> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 1055 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 1068 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> index 166019786653..5637a71c0677 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> @@ -352,6 +352,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
> a slave processor.
>
> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support"
> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO
> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
> + help
> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote
> + processor framework.
> +
> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
> +
> endif # REMOTEPROC
>
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> index 5478c7cb9e07..91314a9b43ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9865b51e0356
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> +
> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */
> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode {
> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, /* When cores run as separate processor */
> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, /* cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk */
> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, /* core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs */
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description
> + *
> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank
> + * @size: Size of Memory bank
> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off
> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework
> + */
> +struct mem_bank_data {
> + phys_addr_t addr;
> + size_t size;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + char *bank_name;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure
> + *
> + * @dev: device of RPU instance
> + * @np: device node of RPU instance
> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data
> + * @rmem_count: Number of reserved mem regions
> + * @rmem: reserved memory region nodes from device tree
> + * @rproc: rproc handle
> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id
> + */
> +struct zynqmp_r5_core {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int tcm_bank_count;
> + struct mem_bank_data **tcm_banks;
> + int rmem_count;
> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
> + struct rproc *rproc;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure
> + *
> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node
> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode
> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode
> + * @r5_cores: Array of pointers pointing to r5 core
> + */
> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster {
> + struct device *dev;
> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode;
> + int core_count;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
> + *
> + * set RPU operation mode
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of
> + * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector
> + * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte
> + * boundaries.
> + *
> + * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or
> + * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory)
> + *
> + * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC.
> + *
> + * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector.
> + * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency
> + * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor
> + * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the
> + * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM.
> + */
> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
> +
> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev,
> + "failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Power down R5 Core.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to map
> + *
> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + void __iomem *va;
> +
> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mem->va = (void *)va;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
> + *
> + * Unmap memory-region carveout
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * add_mem_regions
> + * @r5_core: single R5 core's corresponding zynqmp_r5_core type instance
> + * @rmem: reserved mem region parsed from dt node
> + *
> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
> + * memory-region property
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> + int i, num_mem_regions;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + num_mem_regions = r5_core->rmem_count;
> +
> + /* memory regions not defined */
> + if (num_mem_regions < 1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_mem_regions,
> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc_mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++) {
> + rmem = r5_core->rmem[i];
> +
> + if (!strncmp(rmem->name, "vdev0buffer", strlen("vdev0buffer"))) {
> + /* Register reserved memory for vdev buffer */
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, i,
> + rmem->size,
> + rmem->base,
> + rmem->name);
> + } else {
> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, NULL,
> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> + rmem->size, rmem->base,
> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map,
> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap,
> + rmem->name);
> + }
> +
> + if (!rproc_mem[i])
> + goto release_mem_regions;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "reserved mem carveout %s addr=%llx, size=0x%llx",
> + rmem->name, rmem->base, rmem->size);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
> + * successfully initialized
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++)
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
> +
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_mem_regions:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
> + *
> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * tcm_mem_map
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
> + *
> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
> + * remoteproc carveout.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + void __iomem *va;
> +
> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Update memory entry va */
> + mem->va = (void *)va;
> +
> + /* clear TCMs */
> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
> +
> + /*
> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
> + *
> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
> + */
> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
> +
> + /*
> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
> + *
> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
> + * (0x0 and 0x20000).
> + */
> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
> + mem->da -= 0x90000;
> +
> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i, num_banks, ret;
> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
> + struct device *dev;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + size_t bank_size;
> + char *bank_name;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
> +
> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_banks,
> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc_mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /*
> + * Power-on Each 64KB TCM,
> + * register its address space, map and unmap functions
> + * and add carveouts accordingly
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->addr;
> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->bank_name;
> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_split;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, size=0x%lx",
> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
> +
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
> + bank_size, bank_addr,
> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
> + bank_name);
> + if (!rproc_mem[i]) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_split;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
> + * successfully initialized
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++)
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
> +
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_tcm_split:
> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
> + }
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i, num_banks, ret;
> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
> + size_t bank_size = 0;
> + struct device *dev;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + char *bank_name;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> +
> + /* Go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
> +
> + /*
> + * In lockstep mode, TCM is contiguous memory block
> + * However, each TCM block still needs to be enabled individually.
> + * So, Enable each TCM block individually, but add their size
> + * to create contiguous memory region.
> + */
> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->addr;
> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->bank_name;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> +
> + /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%llx, size=0x%lx",
> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
> +
> + /* Register TCM address range, TCM map and unmap functions */
> + rproc_mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
> + bank_size, bank_addr,
> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
> + bank_name);
> + if (!rproc_mem) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> + }
> +
> + /* If registration is success, add carveouts */
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_tcm_lockstep:
> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * add_tcm_banks()
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
> + * needed for firmware to be loaded
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + if (!r5_core)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> +
> + cluster = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
> + if (!cluster) {
> + dev_err(dev->parent, "Invalid driver data\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * In lockstep mode TCM banks are one contiguous memory region of 256Kb
> + * In split mode, each TCM bank is 64Kb and not contiguous.
> + * We add memory carveouts accordingly.
> + */
> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE)
> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc);
> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc);
> +
> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
> + *
> + * get resource table if available
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> + /*
> + * resource table only required for IPC.
> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
> + * so simply inform user and keep going.
> + */
> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = add_mem_regions_carveout(rproc);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n",
> + ret);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + int i;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
> + dev_warn(r5_core->dev,
> + "can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
> + .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
> + .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
> + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
> + * this is called for each individual R5 core
> + *
> + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
> + *
> + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error.
> + */
> +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Set up DMA mask */
> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
> + r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
> + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
> + if (!r5_rproc) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + }
> +
> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv;
> + r5_core->dev = cdev;
> + r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
> + if (!r5_core->np) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
Here @r5_rproc is leaked and r5_rproc->rproc never free'ed.
> + }
> +
> + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
> + ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
Same.
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
> + return r5_core;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
> + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
> + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from
> + * driver for now in this function.
> + *
It would be a good idea to explain _why_ hardcoded values are used.
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + /*
> + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver while
I'm not sure why there is a "ToDo" here since this is exactly what you are
doing.
> + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM
> + */
> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
> +
> + /* count per core tcm banks */
> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
> +
> + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
As far as I can tell this can't happen and as such should be removed.
> +
> + /*
> + * r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
> + */
> + tcm_node = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
> + /*
> + * Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
> + * parsed from dts.
> + */
> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] =
> + (struct mem_bank_data *)&zynqmp_tcm_banks[tcm_node];
> + tcm_node++;
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()
> + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add
> + * memory region carveouts
> + *
> + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
> + int res_mem_count, i;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> + np = r5_core->np;
> +
> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
> + sizeof(phandle));
> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
> + res_mem_count);
> + r5_core->rmem_count = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, res_mem_count,
> + sizeof(struct reserved_mem *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rmem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
> + if (!rmem_np)
> + goto release_rmem;
> +
> + rmem[i] = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
> + if (!rmem[i]) {
> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> + goto release_rmem;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->rmem_count = res_mem_count;
> + r5_core->rmem = rmem;
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_rmem:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> + kfree(rmem[i]);
Function of_reserved_mem_lookup() doesn't allocate a new reserved_mem structure,
you get a reference to an existing one. As such there is no need to explicitly
free individual elements of the rmem array.
> + devm_kfree(dev, rmem);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_core_init()
> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object
> + *
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
> +
> + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
> + cluster->mode, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init()
> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> +{
> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val;
> + struct device **child_devs;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
> + int core_count, ret, i;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
> +
> + /*
> + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
> + */
> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode.
> + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
> + */
> + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
Why is are LOCKSTEP_MODE and LOCKSTEP_MODE defined when the same values were
already added in xlnx-zynqmp.h in patch 3/6? And why not add SINGLE_CPU_MODE
there as well instead of duplicating things in enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode?
> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
> + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
> + * 2 child nodes are expected.
> + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available,
> + * only use first child node and consider it as core0
> + * and ignore core1 dt node.
> + */
> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
> + if (core_count <= 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
> + core_count = 1;
> + }
> +
> + child_devs = kcalloc(core_count, sizeof(struct device *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!child_devs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + r5_cores = kcalloc(core_count,
> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!r5_cores) {
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> + if (!child_pdev) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_r5_cores;
> + }
> +
> + child_devs[i] = &child_pdev->dev;
> +
> + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */
> + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(r5_cores[i])) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(r5_cores[i]);
> + goto release_r5_cores;
If we are here and i == 0, we are leaking a reference to child_pdev since the
loop in release_r5_cores won't execute.
> + }
> +
> + i++;
> +
> + /*
> + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode,
> + * then ignore second child node.
> + */
> + if (i == core_count) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + break;
> + }
Instead of using the i to check the cores, simply break if cluster_mode ==
LOCKSTEP_MODE. That will avoid the fragile dance around the manipulation of
variable i and simplify the release of resources in release_r5_cores.
> + }
> +
> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
> + cluster->core_count = core_count;
> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
> + cluster->core_count = 0;
> + cluster->r5_cores = NULL;
> + goto release_r5_cores;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_r5_cores:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + put_device(child_devs[i]);
> + rproc_del(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
> + rproc_free(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
> + }
> + kfree(r5_cores);
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i;
> +
> + cluster = (struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!cluster)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> + put_device(r5_core->dev);
> + rproc_del(r5_core->rproc);
> + rproc_free(r5_core->rproc);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(cluster->r5_cores);
> + kfree(cluster);
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
> + *
> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
> + *
> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cluster = kzalloc(sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cluster)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cluster->dev = dev;
> +
> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to populate platform dev\n");
> + kfree(cluster);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
> + if (ret) {
> + zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(pdev);
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
> + { /* end of list */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> + },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> --
> 2.25.1
>
