On 21/09/2022 21:30, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > Hi dee Ho Krzysztof, > > Thanks for looking through this! > > On 9/21/22 22:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 21/09/2022 13:45, Matti Vaittinen wrote: >>> KX022A is a 3-axis Accelerometer from ROHM/Kionix. The senor features >>> include variable ODRs, I2C and SPI control, FIFO/LIFO with watermark IRQ, >>> + >>> +maintainers: >>> + - Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > My own comment - switch the email to the gmail-one. Company mail is > unreliable at best.. > >>> + >>> +description: | >>> + KX022A is a 3-axis accelerometer supporting +/- 2G, 4G, 8G and 16G ranges, >>> + output data-rates from 0.78Hz to 1600Hz and a hardware-fifo buffering. >>> + KX022A can be accessed either via I2C or SPI. >>> + >>> +properties: >>> + compatible: kionix,kx022a >> >> Missing const. I wonder how did it pass testing... > > I originally had > oneOf: > items const ... > construct here as I had separate compatibles for *-spi and *-i2c. I am > unsure if I remembered to run the tests after dropping the extra > compatibles :| - Sorry! I'll fix this. This should be just: compatible: const: foo,bar > >>> + io_vdd-supply: true >> >> No underscores, so io-vdd-supply > > The rationale behind the underscore is that the data-sheet uses terms > vdd and vdd_io (with underscore). I wanted to match the supply name to > what is used in the data-sheet. Not a big thing but I'd rather kept if > same as the data-sheet if the requirement of "no-underscores" is not > "hard". (If it is, then I'll drop the underscore). Underscores trigger warnings at some dtc W level (W=1 or W=2) so they are not allowed. Best regards, Krzysztof