On 21/09/2022 15:12, Asmaa Mnebhi wrote: > I have a question for you and Wolfram, we don’t use device trees and are not planning to use device trees; we only use ACPI tables. But I think when Khalil submitted the first version of the i2c-mlxbf.c driver, it was requested from him to add devicetree support. Do you know why? Is it possible to remove the device tree support and so this doc? or is devicetree support a requirement regardless of the actual implementation? I don't think I am the right person to answer your question. I don't know why you do things and did things in your driver. I also I do not have any interest in your driver supporting anything. However if you do support DT, I have interest in its correctness. Best regards, Krzysztof
