Re: [PATCH V3 2/6] arm64: dts: meson: add S4 Soc PLL clock controller in DT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 30 Aug 2022 at 14:05, Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2022/8/29 17:43, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>> On Mon 15 Aug 2022 at 14:17, Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Jerome,
>>>
>>> On 2022/8/10 21:32, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>> On Fri 05 Aug 2022 at 17:39, Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>>       Thank you for your reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2022/8/5 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>>>> On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>>>> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>     arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>>     1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
>>>>>>>     			#size-cells = <2>;
>>>>>>>     			ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>>>>>>     +			clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
>>>>>> Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
>>>>>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>>>>>
>>>>> I will change to clkc_pll: clock-controller@8000, in next version.
>>>> Same comment applies to the binding doc.
>>> OKay.
>>>> Also it would be nice to split this in two series.
>>>> Bindings and drivers in one, arm64 dt in the other. These changes goes
>>>> in through different trees.
>>> At present, Bindings, DTS and drivers are three series. Do you mean to put
>>> Bindings and drivers together? If so, checkpatch.pl will report a warning.
>> Yes because patches are not in yet so there is a good reason to ignore
>> the warning. Warning will never show up on the actual tree if the
>> patches are correctly ordered.
>
> I think Binding, DTS and drivers use three series and you said two series
> is not a big problem. Three series are recommended for checkpatch.pl, I
> think it should be easy for that to separate and merge。

No - There is only 2 series. 1 for the bindings and clock drivers and
one for the DT once things are in

>
> I've sent it to V4. Please look at V4 and give some comments.
>

That's not how it works. You sent that before v3 review was done. There
are still comments that needed to be addressed

Given the time it takes to make that review I going to completly skip v4
and I'd like on the comment to addressed before you send another version


>> 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>> .
>>>> .
>> .





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux