> -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 4:45 PM > To: Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; > s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kw@xxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Peng Fan > <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; > jdmason@xxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux- > imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; kishon@xxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; > ntb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lznuaa@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] dt-bindings: irqchip: imx mu work as > msi controller > > Caution: EXT Email > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:59:44 +0100, > Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > And I stand by my initial request. "a" doesn't convey any sort of > > > useful information. Why not "I" and "II", while we're at it? Or > > > something even funkier? > > > > MU spec use term "a" and "b", user have to map "I" an "II" to > > "a" and "b" when read MU spec and code. it is not straightforward. > > > > I quote a part of spec. > > " The MU is connected as a peripheral under the Peripheral bus on both > sides-on > > the Processor A-side, the Processor A Peripheral Bus, and on the Processor > B side, > > the Processor B Peripheral Bus." > > > > Rob Herring and Marc Zynginer: > > I can change to any name, which you agree both. > > > > Some options: > > 1. "a", "b" > > 2. "a-side", "b-side" > > 3. "a-facing", "b-facing" > > 4. "I", "II" > > Use the wording indicated in the spec: "processor-a-side", and > "processor-b-side". This is what I asked the first place. @Rob Herring: Do you agree this name? [Frank Li] > > M. > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
