On 12.08.2022 16:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 12/08/2022 16:41, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 12.08.2022 10:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 12/08/2022 09:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 12/08/2022 01:09, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
-patternProperties:
- "^(ethernet-)?ports$":
- type: object
Actually four patches...
I don't find this change explained in commit msg. What is more, it looks
incorrect. All properties and patternProperties should be explained in
top-level part.
Defining such properties (with big piece of YAML) in each if:then: is no
readable.
I can't figure out another way. I need to require certain properties for
a compatible string AND certain enum/const for certain properties which
are inside patternProperties for "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$" by reading
the compatible string.
requiring properties is not equal to defining them and nothing stops you
from defining all properties top-level and requiring them in
allOf:if:then:patternProperties.
If I put allOf:if:then under patternProperties, I can't do the latter.
You can.
Am I supposed to do something like this:
patternProperties:
"^(ethernet-)?ports$":
type: object
patternProperties:
"^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
type: object
description: Ethernet switch ports
unevaluatedProperties: false
properties:
reg:
description:
Port address described must be 5 or 6 for CPU port and
from 0 to 5 for user ports.
allOf:
- $ref: dsa-port.yaml#
- if:
properties:
label:
items:
- const: cpu
then:
allOf:
- if:
properties:
Not really, this is absolutely unreadable.
Usually the way it is handled is:
patternProperties:
"^(ethernet-)?ports$":
type: object
patternProperties:
"^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
type: object
description: Ethernet switch ports
unevaluatedProperties: false
... regular stuff follows
allOf:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
.....
then:
patternProperties:
"^(ethernet-)?ports$":
patternProperties:
"^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
properties:
reg:
const: 5
I admit that it is still difficult to parse, which could justify
splitting to separate schema. Anyway the point of my comment was to
define all properties in top level, not in allOf.
allOf should be used to constrain these properties.
The problem is:
- only specific values of reg are allowed if label is cpu.
- only specific values of phy-mode are allowed if reg is 5 or 6.
This forces me to define properties under allOf:if:then. Splitting to
separate schema (per compatible string?) wouldn't help in this case.
I can split patternProperties to two sections, but I can't directly
define the reg property like you put above.
I can at least split mediatek,mt7531 to a separate schema to have less
patternProperties on a single binding.
What do you think?
Arınç
