On 12/08/2022 09:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/08/2022 01:09, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: >>>> -patternProperties: >>>> - "^(ethernet-)?ports$": >>>> - type: object >>> >>> Actually four patches... >>> >>> I don't find this change explained in commit msg. What is more, it looks >>> incorrect. All properties and patternProperties should be explained in >>> top-level part. >>> >>> Defining such properties (with big piece of YAML) in each if:then: is no >>> readable. >> >> I can't figure out another way. I need to require certain properties for >> a compatible string AND certain enum/const for certain properties which >> are inside patternProperties for "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$" by reading >> the compatible string. > > requiring properties is not equal to defining them and nothing stops you > from defining all properties top-level and requiring them in > allOf:if:then:patternProperties. > > >> If I put allOf:if:then under patternProperties, I can't do the latter. > > You can. > >> >> Other than readability to human eyes, binding check works as intended, >> in case there's no other way to do it. > > I don't see the problem in doing it and readability is one of main > factors of code admission to Linux kernel. One more thought - if your schema around allOf:if:then grows too much, it is actually a sign that it might benefit from splitting. Either into two separate schemas or into common+two separate. Best regards, Krzysztof
