Am 01.08.22 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:15:46PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
>
>> regulator-name:
>> - pattern: "^LDO[1-5]$"
>> description:
>> - should be "LDO1", ..., "LDO5"
>> + Should be "LDO1", ..., "LDO5" or whatever the name of the boards
>> + voltage rail powered by this regulator is.
>
> This should simply be removed from the bindings for the device, devices
> have no business placing any constraint on this generic binding.
Ok, IIUC something like below should do then. I can change this in the
next iteration of this series or send it separately if the rest of the
set gets accepted as-is.
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml
@@ -47,12 +47,6 @@ properties:
description:
Properties for single LDO regulator.
- properties:
- regulator-name:
- pattern: "^LDO[1-5]$"
- description:
- should be "LDO1", ..., "LDO5"
-
unevaluatedProperties: false
"^BUCK[1-6]$":
@@ -62,11 +56,6 @@ properties:
Properties for single BUCK regulator.
properties:
- regulator-name:
- pattern: "^BUCK[1-6]$"
- description:
- should be "BUCK1", ..., "BUCK6"
-
nxp,dvs-run-voltage:
$ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
minimum: 600000
