On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:39:16AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Add missing smem node for ipq8064.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
> > index b5aede3d7ccf..98527a7d885e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
> > @@ -908,6 +908,11 @@ lcc: clock-controller@28000000 {
> > #reset-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > + sfpb_mutex_block: syscon@1200600 {
> > + compatible = "syscon";
>
> syscon alone is not allowed.
>
Mh... This is problematic. How this should be handled?
This should be put in sfpb_mutex and change the driver to use regs if
present instead of syscon?
> > + reg = <0x01200600 0x100>;
> > + };
> > +
> > pcie0: pci@1b500000 {
> > compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064";
> > reg = <0x1b500000 0x1000
> > @@ -1332,4 +1337,17 @@ sdcc3: mmc@12180000 {
> > };
> > };
> > };
> > +
> > + sfpb_mutex: sfpb-mutex {
>
> Generic node names, so hwlock
>
> > + compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex";
> > + syscon = <&sfpb_mutex_block 4 4>;
> > +
> > + #hwlock-cells = <1>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + smem {
> > + compatible = "qcom,smem";
> > + memory-region = <&smem>;
> > + hwlocks = <&sfpb_mutex 3>;
> > + };
> > };
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
Ansuel
