On 07-06-22, 14:41, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + CPU0: cpu@0 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "qcom,kryo";
Generic kryo and not kryoxxx?
> + firmware {
> + scm: scm {
> + compatible = "qcom,scm-sc8280xp", "qcom,scm";
I dont see patch documenting this compatible, was it added earlier, if
not pls add..
> + };
> + };
> +
> + aggre1_noc: interconncet-aggre1-noc {
s/interconncet/interconnect
Hmmm I thought it was required that node name should be interconnect@x
> + qup1: geniqup@ac0000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,geni-se-qup";
> + reg = <0 0x00ac0000 0 0x6000>;
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP_1_M_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP_1_S_AHB_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "m-ahb", "s-ahb";
> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x83 0>;
> +
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
why add this, if no i2c/spi/uarts are defined under this..?
> + usb_0_hsphy: phy@88e5000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-usb-hs-phy",
> + "qcom,usb-snps-hs-5nm-phy";
> + reg = <0 0x088e5000 0 0x400>;
this doesn't match with node address above (I think W=1 would warn you
of such mismatches, useful to run on new dts
> +
> + spmi_bus: spmi@c440000 {
Is the new v7 spmi or older one?
--
~Vinod
