On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 10:52:50AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 07-06-22, 14:41, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > + aggre1_noc: interconncet-aggre1-noc {
> s/interconncet/interconnect
Note that you're reviewing v1 and that this has since been fixed.
> Hmmm I thought it was required that node name should be interconnect@x
> > + usb_0_hsphy: phy@88e5000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-usb-hs-phy",
> > + "qcom,usb-snps-hs-5nm-phy";
> > + reg = <0 0x088e5000 0 0x400>;
>
> this doesn't match with node address above (I think W=1 would warn you
> of such mismatches, useful to run on new dts
This unit address is actually correct, but there were some other
mismatches that were also fixed in v2.
Johan
