On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 04:43:40PM +0800, medadyoung@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Medad CChien <ctcchien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add memory controller support for Nuvoton NPCM SoC.
>
> Note:
> you can force an ecc event by writing a string to edac sysfs node
> and remember to define CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG to enable this feature
> example: force a correctable event on checkcode bit 0
> echo "CE checkcode 0" to below path
> /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/forced_ecc_error
That is silly and wrong: first of all, this all belongs into debugfs.
Then, you need three files:
|->error_type
|->location
|->bit
and there you write all those things. For an example, see
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/inject.c
> Datasheet:
> Cadence DDR Controller Register Reference Manual For DDR4 Memories
> Chapter 2: Detailed Register Map
If that datasheet is not public, no need to mention it here. At least a
quick web search cannot find something relevant.
> Signed-off-by: Medad CChien <ctcchien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> drivers/edac/Kconfig | 17 +
> drivers/edac/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c | 680 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 699 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 7f832e6ed4e5..8919fb83f485 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2372,9 +2372,9 @@ F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nuvoton-npcm*
> F: arch/arm/mach-npcm/
> F: drivers/*/*npcm*
> F: drivers/*/*/*npcm*
> +F: drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c b/drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c
Same file twice?!
> F: include/dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h
>
> -
> ARM/NUVOTON WPCM450 ARCHITECTURE
> M: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
> L: openbmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Kconfig b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
> index 58ab63642e72..aab7ba6c0d15 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
> @@ -539,4 +539,21 @@ config EDAC_DMC520
> Support for error detection and correction on the
> SoCs with ARM DMC-520 DRAM controller.
>
> +config EDAC_NPCM
> + tristate "Nuvoton NPCM DDR Memory Controller"
> + depends on (ARCH_NPCM || COMPILE_TEST)
> + help
> + Support for error detection and correction on the Nuvoton NPCM DDR
> + memory controller.
> +
> + The Nuvoton BMC SoC supports DDR4 memory with and without ECC (error
> + correction check).
> +
> + The memory controller supports single bit error correction, double bit
> + error detection (in-line ECC in which a section (1/8th) of the memory
> + device used to store data is used for ECC storage).
> +
> + First, ECC must be configured in the BootBlock header. Then, this driver
> + will expose error counters via the EDAC kernel framework.
> +
> endif # EDAC
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Makefile b/drivers/edac/Makefile
> index 2d1641a27a28..db3c59d3ad84 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/edac/Makefile
> @@ -84,3 +84,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_QCOM) += qcom_edac.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_ASPEED) += aspeed_edac.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_BLUEFIELD) += bluefield_edac.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_DMC520) += dmc520_edac.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_NPCM) += npcm_edac.o
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c b/drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3eb522c75646
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,680 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (c) 2022 Nuvoton Technology Corporation
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +
> +#include "edac_module.h"
> +
> +#define NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME "npcm-edac"
> +#define FORCED_ECC_ERR_EVENT_SUPPORT BIT(1)
> +#define EDAC_MSG_SIZE 256
> +/* Granularity of reported error in bytes */
> +#define NPCM_EDAC_ERR_GRAIN 1
> +
> +#define MEM_TYPE_DDR4 0xA
> +
> +#define NPCM7XX_CHIP 0x700
> +#define NPCM8XX_CHIP 0x800
> +
> +/* Control register width definitions */
> +#define WDTH_16 (2)
> +#define WDTH_32 (1)
> +#define WDTH_64 (0)
> +#define CTL_MEM_MAX_WIDTH_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
> +#define CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT (32)
> +#define XOR_CHECK_BIT_SPLIT_WIDTH (16)
> +#define CTL_CONTROLLER_BUSY_FLAG BIT(0)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_FORCE_WC BIT(8)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_AUTO_WRITEBACK_EN BIT(24)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_XOR_BITS_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_MTYPE_MASK GENMASK(11, 8)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_GLOBAL_INT_DISABLE BIT(31)
> +
> +/* Syndrome values */
> +#define ECC_DOUBLE_MULTI_ERR_SYND 0x03
Align all those definitions vertically pls.
> +
> +static char data_synd[] = {
> + 0xf4, 0xf1, 0xec, 0xea, 0xe9, 0xe6, 0xe5, 0xe3,
> + 0xdc, 0xda, 0xd9, 0xd6, 0xd5, 0xd3, 0xce, 0xcb,
> + 0xb5, 0xb0, 0xad, 0xab, 0xa8, 0xa7, 0xa4, 0xa2,
> + 0x9d, 0x9b, 0x98, 0x97, 0x94, 0x92, 0x8f, 0x8a,
> + 0x75, 0x70, 0x6d, 0x6b, 0x68, 0x67, 0x64, 0x62,
> + 0x5e, 0x5b, 0x58, 0x57, 0x54, 0x52, 0x4f, 0x4a,
> + 0x34, 0x31, 0x2c, 0x2a, 0x29, 0x26, 0x25, 0x23,
> + 0x1c, 0x1a, 0x19, 0x16, 0x15, 0x13, 0x0e, 0x0b
> +};
> +
> +static char check_synd[] = { 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80 };
That looks unneeded - it is basically the bit number so you can
do:
1 << bit_no
simply and AFAICT.
> +struct npcm_edac_platform_data {
> + /* force ECC event */
> + u32 ip_features;
> + u32 ddr_ctl_controller_busy_reg;
> + u32 ecc_ctl_xor_check_bits_reg;
> +
> + u32 chip;
> +
> + /* DDR4 Controller Registers */
> + u32 ddr_ctl_mem_type_reg;
> + u32 ddr_ctl_mem_width_reg;
> +
> + u32 ecc_ctl_en_reg;
> + u32 ecc_ctl_int_mask;
> + u32 ecc_ctl_int_status;
> + u32 ecc_ctl_int_ack;
> + u32 ecc_ctl_int_mask_master;
> + u32 ecc_ctl_int_mask_ecc;
> +
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_addr_l;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_addr_h;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_data_l;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_data_h;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_id;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_synd;
> +
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_addr_l;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_addr_h;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_data_l;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_data_h;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_id;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_synd;
> +
> + /* MASK */
> + u32 ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask;
> + u32 ecc_ctl_en_int_master_mask;
> + u32 ecc_ctl_en_int_ecc_mask;
> +
> + /* ECC IRQ Macros */
> + u32 ecc_int_ce_event;
> + u32 ecc_int_second_ce_event;
> + u32 ecc_int_ue_event;
> + u32 ecc_int_second_ue_event;
> + u32 ecc_int_ce_ue_mask;
> + u32 ecc_ce_intr_mask;
> + u32 ecc_ue_intr_mask;
> +
> + /* ECC Signature Macros */
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_id_shift;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_synd_shift;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_addr_h_mask;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_id_mask;
> + u32 ecc_sig_c_synd_mask;
> +
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_id_shift;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_synd_shift;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_addr_h_mask;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_id_mask;
> + u32 ecc_sig_u_synd_mask;
Most of those struct members start with "ecc_" - you can basically
remove that prefix.
> +};
> +
> +struct priv_data {
> + void __iomem *reg;
> + u32 ce_cnt;
> + u32 ue_cnt;
> + char message[EDAC_MSG_SIZE];
> + const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip;
> +};
> +
> +
> +static void init_mem_layout(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> +{
> + struct priv_data *priv = mci->pvt_info;
> + const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip = priv->npcm_chip;
> + struct csrow_info *csi;
> + struct dimm_info *dimm;
> + struct sysinfo info;
> + enum mem_type mtype;
> + u32 val, width;
> + u32 size, row;
> + int j;
> +
> + dimm = edac_get_dimm(mci, 0, 0, 0);
> +
^ Superfluous newline.
> + if (dimm)
> + return;
Also, what is that test supposed to do?
> + si_meminfo(&info);
> + size = info.totalram * info.mem_unit;
> + for (row = 0; row < mci->nr_csrows; row++) {
> + csi = mci->csrows[row];
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < csi->nr_channels; j++) {
> + dimm = csi->channels[j]->dimm;
> + dimm->edac_mode = EDAC_FLAG_SECDED;
That vertical alignment on the '=' is just silly, especially if you have
only two assignments and the third one isn't aligned.
> + /* Get memory type by reading hw registers */
> + val = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ddr_ctl_mem_type_reg);
Do I see it correctly that you're reading the same register over and
over again? Why?
> + mtype = val & NPCM_ECC_CTL_MTYPE_MASK;
> + if (mtype == MEM_TYPE_DDR4)
> + dimm->mtype = MEM_DDR4;
> + else
> + dimm->mtype = MEM_EMPTY;
> +
> + /* Get EDAC devtype width for the current mc */
> + width = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ddr_ctl_mem_width_reg)
> + & CTL_MEM_MAX_WIDTH_MASK;
Same here. Push them all outside of the loop.
Also, this one could be split to be made more readable:
width = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ddr_ctl_mem_width_reg);
width &= CTL_MEM_MAX_WIDTH_MASK;
and *here* vertical alignment actually makes sense.
> + switch (width) {
> + case WDTH_16:
> + dimm->dtype = DEV_X2;
> + break;
> + case WDTH_32:
> + dimm->dtype = DEV_X4;
> + break;
> + case WDTH_64:
> + dimm->dtype = DEV_X8;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dimm->dtype = DEV_UNKNOWN;
> + }
> +
> + dimm->nr_pages = (size >> PAGE_SHIFT) /
> + csi->nr_channels;
No need to break that line.
> + dimm->grain = NPCM_EDAC_ERR_GRAIN;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
^ Superfluous newline.
> +static void handle_correctable_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
handle_ce()
> +{
> + struct priv_data *priv = mci->pvt_info;
> + const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip = priv->npcm_chip;
> + u64 err_c_addr = 0x0;
> + u64 err_c_data = 0x0;
> + u32 err_c_synd, err_c_id;
> + u32 sig_val_l, sig_val_h = 0x0;
Why the init to 0 and overwriting them later? Looks useless.
Also,
The EDAC tree preferred ordering of variable declarations at the
beginning of a function is reverse fir tree order::
struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;
unsigned long foo, bar;
unsigned int tmp;
int ret;
The above is faster to parse than the reverse ordering::
int ret;
unsigned int tmp;
unsigned long foo, bar;
struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;
And even more so than random ordering::
unsigned long foo, bar;
int ret;
struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;
unsigned int tmp;
Please fix the rest of the functions too.
> + sig_val_l = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_addr_l);
> +
> + if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP)
> + sig_val_h = (readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_addr_h) &
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_addr_h_mask);
> +
> + err_c_addr = (((err_c_addr | sig_val_h) <<
> + CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | sig_val_l);
> +
> + sig_val_l = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_data_l);
> +
> + if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP)
> + sig_val_h = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_data_h);
> +
> + err_c_data = (((err_c_data | sig_val_h) <<
> + CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | sig_val_l);
> +
> + err_c_id = ((readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_id) &
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_id_mask) >>
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_id_shift);
> +
> + err_c_synd = ((readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_synd) &
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_synd_mask) >>
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_synd_shift);
Why are all those right-hand statements in brackets? Do you need to
brush up on C and operator precedence?
Ditto for the rest of this thing.
> + priv->ce_cnt += 1;
> +
> + snprintf(priv->message,
> + EDAC_MSG_SIZE, "DDR ECC %s: data=0x%llx source_id=%#08x",
> + mci->ctl_name, err_c_data, err_c_id);
> +
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED, mci,
> + priv->ce_cnt,
> + err_c_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + err_c_addr & ~PAGE_MASK,
> + err_c_synd, 0, 0, -1,
> + priv->message, "");
> +}
> +
> +static void handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> +{
> + struct priv_data *priv = mci->pvt_info;
> + const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip = priv->npcm_chip;
> + u64 err_u_addr = 0x0;
> + u64 err_u_data = 0x0;
> + u32 err_u_synd, err_u_id;
> + u32 sig_val_l, sig_val_h = 0x0;
> +
> + sig_val_l = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_addr_l);
> +
> + if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP)
> + sig_val_h = (readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_addr_h) &
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_addr_h_mask);
> +
> + err_u_addr = (((err_u_addr | sig_val_h) <<
> + CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | sig_val_l);
> +
> + sig_val_l = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_data_l);
> +
> + if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP)
> + sig_val_h = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_data_h);
> +
> + err_u_data = (((err_u_data | sig_val_h) <<
> + CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | sig_val_l);
> +
> + err_u_id = ((readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_id) &
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_id_mask) >>
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_id_shift);
> +
> + err_u_synd = ((readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_synd) &
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_synd_mask) >>
> + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_synd_shift);
> + priv->ue_cnt += 1;
> +
> + snprintf(priv->message, EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> + "DDR ECC %s: addr=0x%llx data=0x%llx source_id=%#08x",
> + mci->ctl_name, err_u_addr, err_u_data, err_u_id);
> +
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci,
> + priv->ue_cnt,
> + err_u_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + err_u_addr & ~PAGE_MASK,
> + err_u_synd, 0, 0, -1,
> + priv->message, "");
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t edac_ecc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct mem_ctl_info *mci = dev_id;
> + struct priv_data *priv = mci->pvt_info;
> + const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip = priv->npcm_chip;
> + u32 intr_status;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + /* Check the intr status and confirm ECC error intr */
> + intr_status = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_status);
> +
> + edac_dbg(3, "dev: %s, id: %s: IRQ: %d, interrupt status: 0x%x\n",
> + mci->dev_name, mci->ctl_name, irq, intr_status);
> +
> + val = intr_status & npcm_chip->ecc_int_ce_ue_mask;
> + if (!((val & npcm_chip->ecc_ce_intr_mask) || (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ue_intr_mask)))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
You don't need this check if you do:
if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ce_intr_mask) {
...
} else if if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ue_intr_mask) {
...
} else {
return IRQ_NONE;
}
Also, I'm wondering why this interrupt would be raised if intr_status
won't hold either CE or UE bits set at all?!
> +
> + if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ce_intr_mask) {
> + handle_correctable_error(mci);
> +
> + /* Clear the interrupt source */
> + if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_int_ce_event)
> + writel(npcm_chip->ecc_int_ce_event, priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_ack);
> + else if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_int_second_ce_event)
> + writel(npcm_chip->ecc_int_second_ce_event,
> + priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_ack);
> + else
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed to clear CE IRQ\n");
This looks wrong - you haven't failed to clear the IRQ source - this
looks more like it has to do with the CE and UE bits not being set in
intr_status.
So what is that printk actually there for?
> + }
> +
> + if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ue_intr_mask) {
> + handle_ue(mci);
> +
> + /* Clear the interrupt source */
> + if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_int_ue_event)
> + writel(npcm_chip->ecc_int_ue_event, priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_ack);
> + else if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_int_second_ue_event)
> + writel(npcm_chip->ecc_int_second_ue_event,
> + priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_ack);
> + else
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed to clear UE IRQ\n");
Ditto.
> + }
> +
> + edac_dbg(3, "Total error count CE %d UE %d\n",
> + priv->ce_cnt, priv->ue_cnt);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t forced_ecc_error_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *mattr,
> + char *data)
> +{
> + return sprintf(data, "CDNS-DDR4 Force Injection Help:\n"
> + "Example:\n"
> + "echo \"CE checkcode 0\" > /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/forced_ecc_error\n"
> + "CE: Corrected\n"
> + "UE: Uncorrected\n"
> + "checkcode/data:source\n"
> + "bit [0-63] for data [0-7] for checkcode:bit number\n");
> +}
...
> +static const struct npcm_edac_platform_data npcm7xx_edac = {
> + .chip = NPCM7XX_CHIP,
> +
> + /* CDNS DDR4 Controller Registers */
> + .ecc_ctl_en_reg = 0x174,
> + .ecc_ctl_int_status = 0x1D0,
> + .ecc_ctl_int_ack = 0x1D4,
> + .ecc_ctl_int_mask_master = 0x1D8,
> +
> + .ecc_sig_c_addr_l = 0x188,
> + .ecc_sig_c_data_l = 0x190,
> + .ecc_sig_c_id = 0x194,
> + .ecc_sig_c_synd = 0x18C,
> +
> + .ecc_sig_u_addr_l = 0x17C,
> + .ecc_sig_u_data_l = 0x184,
> + .ecc_sig_u_id = 0x194,
> + .ecc_sig_u_synd = 0x180,
> +
> + /* MASK */
> + .ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask = BIT(24),
> + .ecc_ctl_en_int_master_mask = GENMASK(30, 7) | GENMASK(2, 0),
> +
> + /* ECC IRQ Macros */
> + .ecc_int_ce_event = BIT(3),
> + .ecc_int_second_ce_event = BIT(4),
> + .ecc_int_ue_event = BIT(5),
> + .ecc_int_second_ue_event = BIT(6),
> + .ecc_int_ce_ue_mask = GENMASK(6, 3),
> + .ecc_ce_intr_mask = GENMASK(4, 3),
> + .ecc_ue_intr_mask = GENMASK(6, 5),
> +
> + /* ECC Signature Macros */
> + .ecc_sig_c_id_shift = 16,
> + .ecc_sig_c_synd_shift = 0,
> +
> + .ecc_sig_c_id_mask = GENMASK(29, 16),
> + .ecc_sig_c_synd_mask = GENMASK(6, 0),
> +
> + .ecc_sig_u_id_shift = 0,
> + .ecc_sig_u_synd_shift = 0,
> +
> + .ecc_sig_u_id_mask = GENMASK(13, 0),
> + .ecc_sig_u_synd_mask = GENMASK(6, 0),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct npcm_edac_platform_data npcm8xx_edac = {
> + .ip_features = FORCED_ECC_ERR_EVENT_SUPPORT,
> + .ddr_ctl_controller_busy_reg = 0x20C,
> + .ecc_ctl_xor_check_bits_reg = 0x174,
> +
> + .chip = NPCM8XX_CHIP,
> +
> + /* CDNS DDR4 Controller Registers */
> + .ddr_ctl_mem_type_reg = 0x000,
> + .ddr_ctl_mem_width_reg = 0x00c,
> +
> + .ecc_ctl_en_reg = 0x16C,
> + .ecc_ctl_int_status = 0x228,
> + .ecc_ctl_int_ack = 0x244,
> + .ecc_ctl_int_mask_master = 0x220,
> + .ecc_ctl_int_mask_ecc = 0x260,
> +
> + .ecc_sig_c_addr_l = 0x18C,
> + .ecc_sig_c_addr_h = 0x190,
> + .ecc_sig_c_data_l = 0x194,
> + .ecc_sig_c_data_h = 0x198,
> + .ecc_sig_c_id = 0x19C,
> + .ecc_sig_c_synd = 0x190,
> +
> + .ecc_sig_u_addr_l = 0x17C,
> + .ecc_sig_u_addr_h = 0x180,
> + .ecc_sig_u_data_l = 0x184,
> + .ecc_sig_u_data_h = 0x188,
> + .ecc_sig_u_id = 0x19C,
> + .ecc_sig_u_synd = 0x180,
> +
> + /* MASK */
> + .ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask = GENMASK(17, 16),
> + .ecc_ctl_en_int_master_mask = GENMASK(30, 3) | GENMASK(1, 0),
> + .ecc_ctl_en_int_ecc_mask = GENMASK(8, 4),
> +
> + /* ECC IRQ Macros */
> + .ecc_int_ce_event = BIT(0),
> + .ecc_int_second_ce_event = BIT(1),
> + .ecc_int_ue_event = BIT(2),
> + .ecc_int_second_ue_event = BIT(3),
> + .ecc_int_ce_ue_mask = GENMASK(3, 0),
> + .ecc_ce_intr_mask = GENMASK(1, 0),
> + .ecc_ue_intr_mask = GENMASK(3, 2),
> +
> + /* ECC Signature Macros */
> + .ecc_sig_c_id_shift = 8,
> + .ecc_sig_c_synd_shift = 8,
> + .ecc_sig_c_addr_h_mask = GENMASK(1, 0),
> + .ecc_sig_c_id_mask = GENMASK(29, 16),
> + .ecc_sig_c_synd_mask = GENMASK(15, 8),
> +
> + .ecc_sig_u_id_shift = 0,
> + .ecc_sig_u_synd_shift = 8,
> + .ecc_sig_u_addr_h_mask = GENMASK(1, 0),
> + .ecc_sig_u_id_mask = GENMASK(13, 0),
> + .ecc_sig_u_synd_mask = GENMASK(15, 8),
Now if you want to align something vertically, those would be great
candidates!
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id npcm_edac_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-memory-controller", .data = &npcm7xx_edac },
> + { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-memory-controller", .data = &npcm8xx_edac },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, npcm_edac_of_match);
> +
> +static int npcm_edac_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
No need for a "npcm_" prefix to static functions.
> +{
> + const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct edac_mc_layer layers[1];
> + const struct of_device_id *id;
> + struct priv_data *priv_data;
> + struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
> + struct resource *res;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> + int ret = -ENODEV;
> + int irq;
> + u32 ecc_en;
> +
> + id = of_match_device(npcm_edac_of_match, &pdev->dev);
That function can return NULL.
> + npcm_chip = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
Ditto.
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
This one too.
Pls add proper error handling to all such functions you're calling.
> + reg = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "cdns DDR4 mc regs are not defined\n");
What's "cdns"? Is that message understandable to the normal user?
> + return PTR_ERR(reg);
> + }
> +
> + ecc_en = readl(reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_en_reg);
> +
> + if ((ecc_en & npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask) == npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_INFO, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "ECC reporting and correcting on. ");
> + } else {
> + edac_printk(KERN_INFO, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "ECC disabled\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + edac_printk(KERN_INFO, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "IO mapped reg addr: %p\n", reg);
What's that for?
> +
> + layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_ALL_MEM;
> + layers[0].size = 1;
> +
> + mci = edac_mc_alloc(0, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers,
> + sizeof(struct priv_data));
No need for that line break.
> + if (!mci) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed memory allocation for mc instance\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + mci->pdev = &pdev->dev;
> + priv_data = mci->pvt_info;
> + priv_data->reg = reg;
> + priv_data->npcm_chip = npcm_chip;
> + priv_data->ce_cnt = 0;
> + priv_data->ue_cnt = 0;
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mci);
> +
> + /* Initialize controller capabilities */
> + mci->mtype_cap = MEM_FLAG_DDR4;
> + mci->edac_ctl_cap = EDAC_FLAG_SECDED;
> + mci->scrub_cap = SCRUB_FLAG_HW_SRC;
> + mci->scrub_mode = SCRUB_HW_SRC;
> + mci->edac_cap = EDAC_FLAG_SECDED;
> + mci->ctl_name = id->compatible;
> + mci->dev_name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> + mci->mod_name = NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME;
> + mci->ctl_page_to_phys = NULL;
> +
> + /* Interrupt feature is supported by cadence mc */
No need for capitalizing "Interrupt".
> + edac_op_state = EDAC_OPSTATE_INT;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG))
> + init_mem_layout(mci);
> +
> + /* Set up Interrupt handler for ECC */
Ditto.
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "irq number not defined for ECC.\n");
> + goto err;
You can do the IRQ set up first and then do edac_mc_alloc() so that you
don't need the "goto err" thing.
> + }
> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, edac_ecc_isr, 0, "cdns-edac-mc-ecc-irq", mci);
> + if (ret) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "request_irq fail for NPCM_EDAC irq\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> + ret = edac_mc_add_mc(mci);
> + if (ret) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed to register with EDAC core\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG) &&
> + (npcm_chip->ip_features & FORCED_ECC_ERR_EVENT_SUPPORT) &&
> + npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP) {
> + if (create_sysfs_attributes(mci))
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed to create sysfs entries\n");
> + }
> +
> + /* Only enable MC interrupts with ECC - clear global int mask bit and ecc bit */
s/ecc/ECC/g
> + writel(npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_en_int_master_mask,
> + priv_data->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_mask_master);
> +
> + if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP) {
> + /* clear single and multi for ce and ue */
"CE" ... "UE"
> + writel(npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_en_int_ecc_mask,
> + priv_data->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_mask_ecc);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> + edac_mc_del_mc(&pdev->dev);
This looks like it is missing a label. Dead code - lovely.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
