> > + ufs_1_phy: ufs0-phy@17f04000 {
>
> Node name: "phy" (or ufs-phy). The previous node also could be corrected.
phy@17f04000 looks better. I'll change this and make an additional patch to correct previous ufs0 nodes.
>
> > + compatible = "samsung,exynosautov9-ufs-phy";
> > + reg = <0x17f04000 0xc00>;
> > + reg-names = "phy-pma";
> > + samsung,pmu-syscon = <&pmu_system_controller 0x72c>;
> > + #phy-cells = <0>;
> > + clocks = <&xtcxo>;
> > + clock-names = "ref_clk";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > ufs_0: ufs0@17e00000 {
> > compatible ="samsung,exynosautov9-ufs";
> >
> > @@ -400,6 +411,27 @@ ufs_0: ufs0@17e00000 {
> > samsung,sysreg = <&syscon_fsys2 0x710>;
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > +
> > + ufs_1: ufs0@17f00000 {
> > + compatible ="samsung,exynosautov9-ufs";
> > +
> > + reg = <0x17f00000 0x100>, /* 0: HCI standard */
> > + <0x17f01100 0x410>, /* 1: Vendor-specific */
> > + <0x17f80000 0x8000>, /* 2: UNIPRO */
> > + <0x17de0000 0x2200>; /* 3: UFS protector */
>
> Align these please with first <> entry.
I'll apply this on the next patchset and fix the same on ufs0 node as well.
Best Regards,
Chanho Park
