Am Sonntag, 1. Mai 2022, 21:25:53 CEST schrieb Conor Dooley:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The MPFS system controller has no registers of its own, so move it out
> of the soc node to avoid dtbs_check warnings:
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: soc: syscontroller: {'compatible': ['microchip,mpfs-sys-controller'], 'mboxes': [[15, 0]], 'status': ['okay']} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
>
> Reported-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 528a5b1f2556 ("riscv: dts: microchip: add new peripherals to icicle kit device tree")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
What function does the "soc-bus" have at all?
I.e. mailbox@37020000 also looks like a peripheral
of the chip but is outside it.
And I remember getting the suggestion to not use soc-"busses"
over in arm-land years ago [0].
[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c3030d30d9c99c057b5ddfa289cffa637a2775f5
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
> index 746c4d4e7686..bf21a2edd180 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
> @@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ refclk: mssrefclk {
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> + syscontroller: syscontroller {
> + compatible = "microchip,mpfs-sys-controller";
> + mboxes = <&mbox 0>;
> + };
> +
> soc {
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <2>;
> @@ -446,10 +451,5 @@ mbox: mailbox@37020000 {
> #mbox-cells = <1>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
> -
> - syscontroller: syscontroller {
> - compatible = "microchip,mpfs-sys-controller";
> - mboxes = <&mbox 0>;
> - };
> };
> };
>
