On 01/05/2022 11:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 01/05/2022 12:39, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On 01/05/2022 09:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 30/04/2022 15:09, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Sundance DSP Inc. (https://www.sundancedsp.com/) is a supplier of >>>> high-performance DSP and FPGA processor boards and I/O modules. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> If your @microchip.com email still works, then there is no need to >>> double-sign it. At the end you are still the same person... unless >>> you're not. :) >>> >>> This applies to your other patches as well. >> >> I thought that the last SoB had to match the email it was sent from? >> If that's not the case, my bad. The @microchip email still works, but >> it would've meant waiting til Tuesday to resend. > > The "From" address must match the SoB address. The person, rather than > the email, sending the patch should be the last SoB. I almost do not > recall cases where two SoBs were added in such flow like yours. That makes things easier! Thanks for clearing that up for me, must have misunderstood. Thanks, Conor.
