On 01/05/2022 12:39, Conor Dooley wrote: > On 01/05/2022 09:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 30/04/2022 15:09, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Sundance DSP Inc. (https://www.sundancedsp.com/) is a supplier of >>> high-performance DSP and FPGA processor boards and I/O modules. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> If your @microchip.com email still works, then there is no need to >> double-sign it. At the end you are still the same person... unless >> you're not. :) >> >> This applies to your other patches as well. > > I thought that the last SoB had to match the email it was sent from? > If that's not the case, my bad. The @microchip email still works, but > it would've meant waiting til Tuesday to resend. The "From" address must match the SoB address. The person, rather than the email, sending the patch should be the last SoB. I almost do not recall cases where two SoBs were added in such flow like yours. Best regards, Krzysztof
