Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] ARM: regulator: add Freescale MXS regulator driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Stefan,

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Am 10.09.2014 17:13, schrieb Mark Brown:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:18:53PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:17:17PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ugh, this looks like it might be a regulator driver but since the
>> subject line was "ARM: " I deleted it unread - if your changelog looks
>> different to all the other changelogs in the subsystem it probably needs
>> changing.
>
>
> sorry about the confusion, i will remove ARM in the next version.
>
> Changelog? I didn't send a changelog because it was my first version.
>
> Should i resend this version only to you?

In the cover letter of this RFC series you mentioned that this has not
been tested on real hardware.

What about sending a new version of this series (with the RFC prefix
removed and with Mark Rutland's suggestion implemented) tested on a
mx28 board and also with the Subject of the regulator patch changed to
'regulator: add support for mxs regulator" with Mark Brown on Cc?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux