Hi Rob,
On 2022/03/29 1:23, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:11:38 +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
Convert the file into a JSON description at the yaml format.
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/pci/socionext,uniphier-pcie.yaml | 100
++++++++++++++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/pci/uniphier-pcie.txt | 82 --------------
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/socionext,uniphier-pcie.yaml
delete mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/uniphier-pcie.txt
Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.
Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1609988
pcie@66000000: compatible: ['socionext,uniphier-pcie', 'snps,dw-pcie']
is too long
arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-akebi96.dt.yaml
arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-global.dt.yaml
arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-ref.dt.yaml
arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-pxs3-ref.dt.yaml
Ignore this if your intent is to fix these by dropping 'snps,dw-pcie'. I
think that is the right thing to do. 'snps,dw-pcie' is not too
meaningful.
I see. I should remove "snps,dw-pcie" from the existing devicetree, so
I'll fix it as a devicetree patch.
Thank you,
---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi
