On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:11:38 +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote: > > Convert the file into a JSON description at the yaml format. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/pci/socionext,uniphier-pcie.yaml | 100 ++++++++++++++++++ > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/uniphier-pcie.txt | 82 -------------- > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/socionext,uniphier-pcie.yaml > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/uniphier-pcie.txt > > > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is > incorrect. These may not be new warnings. > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. > This will change in the future. > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1609988 > > > pcie@66000000: compatible: ['socionext,uniphier-pcie', 'snps,dw-pcie'] is too long > arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-akebi96.dt.yaml > arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-global.dt.yaml > arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-ref.dt.yaml > arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-pxs3-ref.dt.yaml Ignore this if your intent is to fix these by dropping 'snps,dw-pcie'. I think that is the right thing to do. 'snps,dw-pcie' is not too meaningful. Rob
