On 24/03/2022 10:42, Jia-Wei Chang wrote: > On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 19:59 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 07/03/2022 13:21, Tim Chang wrote: >>> 1. add cci property. >>> 2. add example of MT8186. >> >> One logical change at a time. Are these related? Why entirely new >> example just for "cci" node? Maybe this should be part of existing >> example? > > Yes, the cci property is required in some SoC, e.g. mt8183 and mt8186, > because cpu and cci share the same power supplies. I asked why this cannot be part of existing example. > I will update the commit message and add an example of mt8186 to > present usage of cci. You added the example here, didn't you? Best regards, Krzysztof
