On 07/03/2022 13:21, Tim Chang wrote: > 1. add cci property. > 2. add example of MT8186. One logical change at a time. Are these related? Why entirely new example just for "cci" node? Maybe this should be part of existing example? > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek.yaml | 41 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek.yaml > index 584946eb3790..d3ce17fd8fcf 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek.yaml > @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ properties: > When absent, the voltage scaling flow is handled by hardware, hence no > software "voltage tracking" is needed. > > + cci: > + description: > + Phandle of the cci to be linked with the phandle of CPU if present. This does not look like a standard type, so you need type. Best regards, Krzysztof
