On 07/03/2022 13:21, Tim Chang wrote:
> cleanup of naming, print log and comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 487 ++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 233 insertions(+), 254 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> index 8e9d706d8081..3f00c7eb01f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> /*
> - * Copyright (c) 2015 Linaro Ltd.
> - * Author: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 MediaTek Inc.
Removal of authorship and existing copyrights does not fit into "clean
up". Please explain this thoroughly.
> */
>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> @@ -22,7 +21,7 @@
> #define VOLT_TOL (10000)
>
> /*
> - * The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info holds necessary information for doing CPU DVFS
> + * The struct mtk_cpufreq_drv holds necessary information for doing CPU DVFS
> * on each CPU power/clock domain of Mediatek SoCs. Each CPU cluster in
> * Mediatek SoCs has two voltage inputs, Vproc and Vsram. In some cases the two
> * voltage inputs need to be controlled under a hardware limitation:
> @@ -32,7 +31,7 @@
> * needs to be switched to another stable PLL clock temporarily until
> * the original PLL becomes stable at target frequency.
> */
> -struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
> +struct mtk_cpufreq_drv {
> struct cpumask cpus;
> struct device *cpu_dev;
> struct regulator *proc_reg;
> @@ -40,45 +39,45 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
> struct clk *cpu_clk;
> struct clk *inter_clk;
> struct list_head list_head;
> - int intermediate_voltage;
> + int inter_voltage;
> bool need_voltage_tracking;
> - int old_vproc;
> - struct mutex lock; /* avoid notify and policy race condition */
> + int old_voltage;
> + struct mutex lock; /* avoid notify and policy race condition */
> struct notifier_block opp_nb;
> int opp_cpu;
> unsigned long opp_freq;
> };
>
> -static LIST_HEAD(dvfs_info_list);
> +static LIST_HEAD(drv_list);
>
> -static struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(int cpu)
> +static struct mtk_cpufreq_drv *mtk_cpufreq_drv_lookup(int cpu)
> {
> - struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info;
> + struct mtk_cpufreq_drv *drv;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(info, &dvfs_info_list, list_head) {
> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &info->cpus))
> - return info;
> + list_for_each_entry(drv, &drv_list, list_head) {
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &drv->cpus))
> + return drv;> }
>
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> - int new_vproc)
> +static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpufreq_drv *drv,
> + int new_voltage)
> {
> - struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg;
> - struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg;
> - int old_vproc, old_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret;
> -
> - old_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
> - if (old_vproc < 0) {
> - pr_err("%s: invalid Vproc value: %d\n", __func__, old_vproc);
> - return old_vproc;
> + struct regulator *proc_reg = drv->proc_reg;
> + struct regulator *sram_reg = drv->sram_reg;
> + int old_voltage, old_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, voltage, ret;
> +
> + old_voltage = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
> + if (old_voltage < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: invalid vproc value: %d\n", __func__, old_voltage);
> + return old_voltage;
Several different changes in one commit. Please read the document
"Submitting patches".
(...)
> -MODULE_AUTHOR("Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
Ekhm, why? He was not the author?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
