On 20/03/2022 12:08, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2022-03-20 11:54, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 19/03/2022 21:46, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> Convert the ocelot-pinctrl device tree binding to the new YAML format.
>>>
>>> Additionally to the original binding documentation, add interrupt
>>> properties which are optional and already used on several SoCs like
>>> SparX-5, Luton, Ocelot and LAN966x but were not documented before.
>>>
>>> Also, on the sparx5 and the lan966x SoCs there are two items for the
>>> reg property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.txt | 42 -------
>>> .../bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.yaml | 108
>>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.txt
>>> create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.txt
>>> deleted file mode 100644
>>> index 5d84fd299ccf..000000000000
>>> ---
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.txt
>>> +++ /dev/null
>>> @@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
>>> -Microsemi Ocelot pin controller Device Tree Bindings
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> -Required properties:
>>> - - compatible : Should be "mscc,ocelot-pinctrl",
>>> - "mscc,jaguar2-pinctrl", "microchip,sparx5-pinctrl",
>>> - "mscc,luton-pinctrl", "mscc,serval-pinctrl",
>>> - "microchip,lan966x-pinctrl" or "mscc,servalt-pinctrl"
>>> - - reg : Address and length of the register set for the device
>>> - - gpio-controller : Indicates this device is a GPIO controller
>>> - - #gpio-cells : Must be 2.
>>> - The first cell is the pin number and the
>>> - second cell specifies GPIO flags, as defined in
>>> - <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
>>> - - gpio-ranges : Range of pins managed by the GPIO controller.
>>> -
>>> -
>>> -The ocelot-pinctrl driver uses the generic pin multiplexing and
>>> generic pin
>>> -configuration documented in pinctrl-bindings.txt.
>>> -
>>> -The following generic properties are supported:
>>> - - function
>>> - - pins
>>> -
>>> -Example:
>>> - gpio: pinctrl@71070034 {
>>> - compatible = "mscc,ocelot-pinctrl";
>>> - reg = <0x71070034 0x28>;
>>> - gpio-controller;
>>> - #gpio-cells = <2>;
>>> - gpio-ranges = <&gpio 0 0 22>;
>>> -
>>> - uart_pins: uart-pins {
>>> - pins = "GPIO_6", "GPIO_7";
>>> - function = "uart";
>>> - };
>>> -
>>> - uart2_pins: uart2-pins {
>>> - pins = "GPIO_12", "GPIO_13";
>>> - function = "uart2";
>>> - };
>>> - };
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..7149a6655623
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/mscc,ocelot-pinctrl.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Microsemi Ocelot pin controller
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> + - Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - microchip,lan966x-pinctrl
>>> + - microchip,sparx5-pinctrl
>>> + - mscc,jaguar2-pinctrl
>>> + - mscc,luton-pinctrl
>>> + - mscc,ocelot-pinctrl
>>> + - mscc,serval-pinctrl
>>> + - mscc,servalt-pinctrl
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + items:
>>> + - description: Base address
>>> + - description: Extended pin configuration registers
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + gpio-controller: true
>>> +
>>> + '#gpio-cells':
>>> + const: 2
>>> +
>>> + gpio-ranges: true
>>> +
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + interrupt-controller: true
>>> +
>>> + "#interrupt-cells":
>>> + const: 2
>>
>> Thanks for the changes in other files, but I think you did not respond
>> to my comments here. Can you address them?
>
> Sorry, I might missunderstood you. They are currently used on all except
> on serval and servalt SoCs like described in the updated commit message.
> I thought it was clear from the commit message, so I didn't answer your
> questions in v2. Or is there something else?
>
No, it's okay.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
