On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:09:21 +0000, Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 6:28 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 04:39:34 +0000, > > Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(thead_c900_plic, "thead,c900-plic", plic_init); > > > I think we should give clear info in /proc/interrupts. I hope we could > > > keep thead_plic_init. > > > > Why? There is no material difference at the driver level, and > > /proc/interrupts won't be the target of a branding exercise (which > > this series seems to be all about). > It's not a branding exercise, the series just correct the broken code > & incorrect /proc/interrupts display. There is *nothing* incorrect in /proc/interrupt. If anything, changing the string *is* an ABI change, for no good reason. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
