On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:12:12AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote: > > > > The 'big-endian-data' property is originally used to indicate whether the > > > LSB firstly or MSB firstly will be transmitted to the CODEC or received > > > from the CODEC, and there has nothing relation to the memory data. > > > Both Nicolin [1] and Mark [2] asked for the old property to be kept > > around for compatibility reasons. Those requests seem to have been > > ignored entirely; the commit message doesn't even describe why you > > believe removing support for the old property is safe. > > The response was that the relevant chips aren't out in the wild so it's > vanishingly unlikely that anyone would have a real DT with this option > enabled. I'll defer to Nicolin on if that's the case or not. Yea, it sounds like so. I thought Vf610 also used this property. But if only LS1 using it, I think we may consent this rename right? Nicolin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
