On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:12:12AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote: > > The 'big-endian-data' property is originally used to indicate whether the > > LSB firstly or MSB firstly will be transmitted to the CODEC or received > > from the CODEC, and there has nothing relation to the memory data. > Both Nicolin [1] and Mark [2] asked for the old property to be kept > around for compatibility reasons. Those requests seem to have been > ignored entirely; the commit message doesn't even describe why you > believe removing support for the old property is safe. The response was that the relevant chips aren't out in the wild so it's vanishingly unlikely that anyone would have a real DT with this option enabled. I'll defer to Nicolin on if that's the case or not.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
