On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 02:39:36 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > > +
> > > +static struct of_device_id rk808_of_match[] = {
> > > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk808" },
> > > +};
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rk808_of_match);
> > > +
> > > +static const struct i2c_device_id rk808_ids[] = {
> > > + { "rk808" },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, rk808_ids);
> >
> > My OCD senses are tingling. Either have a blank line above the calls
> > to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() or don't.
>
> Wait, don't we also need sentinel entries in both these tables?
Good spot, yes please.
{ },
Will do fine.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
