On Thu 06 Jan 2022 at 11:25, Liang Yang <liang.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because EMMC and NAND have the same control clock register, so we
> implement a 'sd_emmc_c_clkc'. Previously DTS is defined as below:
>
> sd_emmc_c_clkc: mmc@7000 {
> compatible = "amlogic,meson-axg-mmc-clkc", "syscon";
> reg = <0x0 0x7000 0x0 0x800>;
> };
>
> nand-controller@7800 {
> ......
>
> clocks = <&clkc CLKID_SD_EMMC_C>,
> <&sd_emmc_c_clkc CLKID_MMC_DIV>,
> <&sd_emmc_c_clkc CLKID_MMC_PHASE_RX>,
> <&sd_emmc_c_clkc CLKID_MMC_PHASE_TX>;
> clock-names = "core", "device", "rx", "tx";
> amlogic,mmc-syscon = <&sd_emmc_c_clkc>;
>
> ......
> }
>
> but in fact, above implementation is rejected. so now registering
> a nand_divider.
Can you give a bit of context ? a link to the discussion rejecting this
As far as remember, things were getting done for A1 and stopped before
clock part was finished. I'm saying the change is wrong, just that a
discussion is needed before a decision is made.
>
> Change-Id: Ibeb4c7ff886f5886aac4d6c664d7bbd1b1bcb997
> Signed-off-by: Liang Yang <liang.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> index ac3be92872d0..4472363059c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> /*
> * Amlogic Meson Nand Flash Controller Driver
> *
> - * Copyright (c) 2018 Amlogic, inc.
> + * Copyright (c) 2018-2021 Amlogic, inc.
> * Author: Liang Yang <liang.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> */
>
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@
> #define NFC_REG_VER 0x38
>
> #define NFC_RB_IRQ_EN BIT(21)
> +#define NFC_CMD_FIFO_RESET BIT(31)
>
> #define CMDRWGEN(cmd_dir, ran, bch, short_mode, page_size, pages) \
> ( \
> @@ -104,6 +106,9 @@
>
> #define PER_INFO_BYTE 8
>
> +#define CLK_DIV_SHIFT 0
> +#define CLK_DIV_WIDTH 6
> +
> struct meson_nfc_nand_chip {
> struct list_head node;
> struct nand_chip nand;
> @@ -151,15 +156,15 @@ struct meson_nfc {
> struct nand_controller controller;
> struct clk *core_clk;
> struct clk *device_clk;
> - struct clk *phase_tx;
> - struct clk *phase_rx;
I would have been nice to explain why these clock are no longer
required, in the change description maybe ?
> + struct clk *nand_clk;
> + struct clk_divider nand_divider;
>
> unsigned long clk_rate;
> u32 bus_timing;
>
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *reg_base;
> - struct regmap *reg_clk;
> + void __iomem *reg_clk;
> struct completion completion;
> struct list_head chips;
> const struct meson_nfc_data *data;
> @@ -406,12 +411,14 @@ static int meson_nfc_queue_rb(struct meson_nfc *nfc, int timeout_ms)
> cmd = NFC_CMD_RB | NFC_CMD_RB_INT
> | nfc->param.chip_select | nfc->timing.tbers_max;
> writel(cmd, nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
> -
> + meson_nfc_drain_cmd(nfc);
is this clock related ?
> ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nfc->completion,
> msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
> if (ret == 0)
> ret = -1;
>
> + /* reset command fifo to avoid lock */
> + writel(NFC_CMD_FIFO_RESET, nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
Again, not seem to be clock related - does not belong in this patch
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -988,8 +995,9 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops meson_ooblayout_ops = {
> static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
> {
> int ret;
> + struct clk_init_data init = {0};
> + const char *fix_div2_pll_name[1];
>
> - /* request core clock */
Why is the comment bothering you ?
> nfc->core_clk = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "core");
> if (IS_ERR(nfc->core_clk)) {
> dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get core clock\n");
> @@ -1002,21 +1010,25 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
> return PTR_ERR(nfc->device_clk);
> }
>
> - nfc->phase_tx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "tx");
> - if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_tx)) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get TX clk\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_tx);
> - }
> -
> - nfc->phase_rx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "rx");
> - if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_rx)) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get RX clk\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_rx);
> - }
> + init.name = devm_kstrdup(nfc->dev, "nfc#div", GFP_KERNEL);
> + init.ops = &clk_divider_ops;
> + fix_div2_pll_name[0] = __clk_get_name(nfc->device_clk);
You should be using "fw_name" so CCF looks a DT directly, instead of this
> + init.parent_names = fix_div2_pll_name;
> + init.num_parents = 1;
> + nfc->nand_divider.reg = nfc->reg_clk;
> + nfc->nand_divider.shift = CLK_DIV_SHIFT;
> + nfc->nand_divider.width = CLK_DIV_WIDTH;
> + nfc->nand_divider.hw.init = &init;
> + nfc->nand_divider.flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED |
> + CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST |
> + CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO;
> +
> + nfc->nand_clk = devm_clk_register(nfc->dev, &nfc->nand_divider.hw);
> + if (IS_ERR(nfc->nand_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(nfc->nand_clk);
>
> /* init SD_EMMC_CLOCK to sane defaults w/min clock rate */
> - regmap_update_bits(nfc->reg_clk,
> - 0, CLK_SELECT_NAND, CLK_SELECT_NAND);
> + writel(CLK_SELECT_NAND | readl(nfc->reg_clk), nfc->reg_clk);
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->core_clk);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -1030,29 +1042,21 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
> goto err_device_clk;
> }
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_tx);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->nand_clk);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable TX clock\n");
> - goto err_phase_tx;
> - }
> -
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_rx);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable RX clock\n");
> - goto err_phase_rx;
> + dev_err(nfc->dev, "pre enable NFC divider fail\n");
> + goto err_nand_clk;
> }
>
> ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, 24000000);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_disable_rx;
> + goto err_disable_clk;
>
> return 0;
>
> -err_disable_rx:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
> -err_phase_rx:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
> -err_phase_tx:
> +err_disable_clk:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
> +err_nand_clk:
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
> err_device_clk:
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
> @@ -1061,8 +1065,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>
> static void meson_nfc_disable_clk(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
> {
> - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
> }
> @@ -1375,6 +1378,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct meson_nfc *nfc;
> struct resource *res;
> + u32 ext_clk_reg;
> int ret, irq;
>
> nfc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1396,9 +1400,15 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base))
> return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base);
>
> - nfc->reg_clk =
> - syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
> - "amlogic,mmc-syscon");
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "sd_emmc_c_clkc",
> + &ext_clk_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get NAND external clock register\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + nfc->reg_clk = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, ext_clk_reg, sizeof(int));
That's how you should get a register region.
If you want an example of a device claiming several region on amlogic,
have a look at the pinctrl driver.
> if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n");
> return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
