On Tuesday 19 August 2014 02:20 PM, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:50:59AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Mugunthan,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Thus, for this patchset, as is:
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> This will fail for DRA7xx not in AM33xx
>>>
>> cpsw_am33xx_cm_get_macid() checks for
>> of_machine_is_compatible("ti,am33xx") and returns 0 if the machine is
>> not an am33xx. cpsw_probe_dt() only propagates the return value if is
>> not 0 so this patch does not change the semantics for other SoCs
>> besides am33xx.
> Yes, this patch is only about the am33xx. I don't have the DRA7xx
> hardware so I am not able to test on that hardware. Mugunthan, perhaps
> you can supply some followup patches for DRA7xx.
>
>
I will check on this thursday and update.
Regards
Mugunthan V N
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
