Hi,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:50:59AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Mugunthan,
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thus, for this patchset, as is:
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This will fail for DRA7xx not in AM33xx
> >
>
> cpsw_am33xx_cm_get_macid() checks for
> of_machine_is_compatible("ti,am33xx") and returns 0 if the machine is
> not an am33xx. cpsw_probe_dt() only propagates the return value if is
> not 0 so this patch does not change the semantics for other SoCs
> besides am33xx.
Yes, this patch is only about the am33xx. I don't have the DRA7xx
hardware so I am not able to test on that hardware. Mugunthan, perhaps
you can supply some followup patches for DRA7xx.
Best regards,
Markus
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
