Hi Stephen, On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 12:03 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2021-10-15 10:09:10) > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:59 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:02 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Quoting Rob Herring (2021-10-14 09:18:16) > > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:48 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't explicitly build DT documentation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Since I use the build bots to let me know if there are strange !(C, > > > > > > ASM, arm, aarch64, mips, ppc, x86) build issues or ones with odd > > > > > > configuration possibilities (randconfig) in the repos I maintain, you > > > > > > might have to convince them that this is important too. > > > > > > > > > > It's really just a matter of turning on the build in > > > > > allyesconfig/allmodconfig builds. I've not done that primarily because > > > > > there's one person I don't want to yell at me, but I could probably > > > > > make it arm and/or arm64 only. It's really arch and config > > > > > independent, so doing it multiple times is kind of pointless. > > > > > > > > > > I assume for bots you mean kernel-ci mainly? Do you run that before > > > > > stuff gets into linux-next? IMO, that's too late. But still a slight > > > > > improvement if things go in via one tree. Otherwise, I see the > > > > > breakage twice, 1st linux-next then the merge window. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I run `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES="<path to yaml file>"` but > > > > nowadays this seems to check all the bindings and not just the one > > > > binding I care to check. Did something break? > > > > > > It should apply all the schemas to the example in DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > > Originally, it only applied DT_SCHEMA_FILES schema to the example in > > > DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > > > Probably Stephen means that yamllint is still run on all files, which > > I tried to fix in [1]? > > > > I've been running an improved version for months, but I haven't sent > > it out yet. > > > > Oh yeah probably. Do I need to carry this patch locally until it is > fixed? Submitted the improved version: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1634551582.git.geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
