On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:02 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Rob Herring (2021-10-14 09:18:16) > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:48 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I don't explicitly build DT documentation. > > > > > > Since I use the build bots to let me know if there are strange !(C, > > > ASM, arm, aarch64, mips, ppc, x86) build issues or ones with odd > > > configuration possibilities (randconfig) in the repos I maintain, you > > > might have to convince them that this is important too. > > > > It's really just a matter of turning on the build in > > allyesconfig/allmodconfig builds. I've not done that primarily because > > there's one person I don't want to yell at me, but I could probably > > make it arm and/or arm64 only. It's really arch and config > > independent, so doing it multiple times is kind of pointless. > > > > I assume for bots you mean kernel-ci mainly? Do you run that before > > stuff gets into linux-next? IMO, that's too late. But still a slight > > improvement if things go in via one tree. Otherwise, I see the > > breakage twice, 1st linux-next then the merge window. > > > > I run `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES="<path to yaml file>"` but > nowadays this seems to check all the bindings and not just the one > binding I care to check. Did something break? It should apply all the schemas to the example in DT_SCHEMA_FILES. Originally, it only applied DT_SCHEMA_FILES schema to the example in DT_SCHEMA_FILES. Rob