On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 17:34 +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote: > On 08/05/2014 05:32 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 17:25 +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote: > >> On 08/05/2014 04:24 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >> > >> (...) > >> > >>> +#include <linux/io.h> > >>> +#include <linux/module.h> > >>> +#include <linux/serial_8250.h> > >>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h> > >>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > >>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > >>> +#include <linux/clk.h> > >>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > >>> +#include "8250.h" > >>> + > >> Better if we have includes in alphabetical order.. > > > > So 8250.h would be first and it wouldn't compile ??? > > > > Can we stick to serious critiques ? > > The local headers should be at the end of all includes Which is not alaphetical order The include ordering does not matter, please stick to actual things that matter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
