Hello. On 01-08-2014 9:22, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
The board uses aic3106 for audio.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts index 09118c72e83f..b9ef2be0b145 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts @@ -51,6 +51,20 @@ tps: tps@48 { reg = <0x48>; }; + tlv320aic3106: tlv320aic3106@1b {
[...]
Also, the ePAPR standard [1] says:
The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model.
True. This is why the node for the audio support is named as 'sound'. For the components, like in this case I do not see issue to call the audio codec with it's name.
I do. We should follow the standard consistently. Why not call the node "sound-codec"?
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
