On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 31.07.2014 11:49, schrieb Ajay kumar:
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Am 30.07.2014 15:50, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..bcca892bf2ff
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts
>>> [...]
>>>> +&pinctrl_0 {
>>>> + dp_hpd_gpio: dp-hpd-gpio {
>>>> + samsung,pins = "gpc3-0";
>>>> + samsung,pin-function = <1>;
>>>
>>> Not sure where this 1 came from... Both Ajay and my 3.8 DT have 0.
>> Right, this should be 0.
>>
>>>> + samsung,pin-pud = <3>;
>>>> + samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>>> + };
>>>
>>> Seeing that Ajay called this node dp-hdp, it should probably be an override?
>> dp_hpd should be enough. I will keep the same name for peach boards.
>> dp_hpd: dp-hpd {
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> };
>
> Apart from my own set of typos, I see that you proposed dp-hpd whereas
> -pinctrl.dtsi has dp_hpd (dash vs. underscore). My question is, can we
> override the pinctrl one instead of adding a new one, or do they need to
> coexist?
The one in exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi will be used only for smdk5250/snow.
For spring, you can override the same.
Ajay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
