Hi, Am 31.07.2014 11:49, schrieb Ajay kumar: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 30.07.2014 15:50, schrieb Andreas Färber: >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..bcca892bf2ff >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts >> [...] >>> +&pinctrl_0 { >>> + dp_hpd_gpio: dp-hpd-gpio { >>> + samsung,pins = "gpc3-0"; >>> + samsung,pin-function = <1>; >> >> Not sure where this 1 came from... Both Ajay and my 3.8 DT have 0. > Right, this should be 0. > >>> + samsung,pin-pud = <3>; >>> + samsung,pin-drv = <0>; >>> + }; >> >> Seeing that Ajay called this node dp-hdp, it should probably be an override? > dp_hpd should be enough. I will keep the same name for peach boards. > dp_hpd: dp-hpd { > . > . > . > }; Apart from my own set of typos, I see that you proposed dp-hpd whereas -pinctrl.dtsi has dp_hpd (dash vs. underscore). My question is, can we override the pinctrl one instead of adding a new one, or do they need to coexist? Thanks, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html