Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andre, Rob,
On 16:38-20210126, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Now that I look back at the dtc change, I'm now confused why this 
> > check got applied. Both David and I wanted changes in regards to 
> > #address-cells. Either a separate check or part of interrupt-map checks. 
> > And the interrupt-map check never got applied. Andre?
> 
> Yeah, I somewhat dropped the ball on this, after some iterations and a
> partial merge. Will put it on my list to revive this.


I was hoping we made some steps, but I did see [1] as well and it is
possible that I am missing some discussion, but it is starting to get
W=2 builds warnings noisy enough to start interfering with discovering
real problems as we keep adding new stuff in.. Just wondering...


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAL_Jsq++DyiKG9smQGx9FAPDJnVrezcXNb0Y5uh-5_2GBzTQpQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[2] https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ns6hPCBxVM/

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux