Hi Rob, On 17/11/2020 18:19, Sekhar Nori wrote:
With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2 results in warnings like below for all interrupt controllers. /bus@100000/bus@30000000/interrupt-controller1: Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider Fix these by adding #address-cells = <0>; for all interrupt controllers in TI device-tree files. Any other #address-cells value is really only needed if interrupt-map property is being used (which is not the case for existing TI device-tree files) Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 5 +++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi | 2 ++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi | 3 +++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi | 3 +++ 8 files changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi index aa8725db0187..55aaa1404d7d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi @@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ interrupt-controller; interrupt-parent = <&gic500>; #interrupt-cells = <1>; + #address-cells = <0>;
Does it really required or mandatory to have #address-cells = <0>; defined for interrupt-controller DT nodes which do not have child nodes and no "interrupt-map"? -- Best regards, grygorii
