Hi, On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 18:48 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 21/09/2020 13:03, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote: > > Add arbiter capability for pwrap driver. > > Can you provide a bit more verbose commit message, please. > Thanks for reviewing. I will update it in next patch. > > This patch is preparing for adding mt6873/8192 pwrap support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > index c897205..149bf02 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > @@ -25,10 +25,12 @@ > > > > /* macro for wrapper status */ > > #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_RDATA(x) (((x) >> 0) & 0x0000ffff) > > +#define PWRAP_GET_WACS_ARB_FSM(x) (((x) >> 1) & 0x00000007) > > #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(x) (((x) >> 16) & 0x00000007) > > #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_REQ(x) (((x) >> 19) & 0x00000001) > > #define PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0 BIT(20) > > #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 BIT(21) > > +#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1 BIT(15) > > > > /* macro for WACS FSM */ > > #define PWRAP_WACS_FSM_IDLE 0x00 > > @@ -74,6 +76,7 @@ > > #define PWRAP_CAP_DCM BIT(2) > > #define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN BIT(3) > > #define PWRAP_CAP_WDT_SRC1 BIT(4) > > +#define PWRAP_CAP_ARB BIT(5) > > > > /* defines for slave device wrapper registers */ > > enum dew_regs { > > @@ -340,6 +343,8 @@ enum pwrap_regs { > > PWRAP_DCM_DBC_PRD, > > PWRAP_EINT_STA0_ADR, > > PWRAP_EINT_STA1_ADR, > > + PWRAP_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0, > > + PWRAP_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0, > > > > /* MT2701 only regs */ > > PWRAP_ADC_CMD_ADDR, > > @@ -1108,14 +1113,22 @@ static void pwrap_writel(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 val, enum pwrap_regs reg) > > > > static bool pwrap_is_fsm_idle(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > > { > > - u32 val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA); > > + if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB)) > > + return PWRAP_GET_WACS_ARB_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_IDLE; > > > > return PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_IDLE; > > } > > > > static bool pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > > { > > - u32 val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA); > > + if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB)) > > + return PWRAP_GET_WACS_ARB_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR; > > > > return PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR; > > } > > @@ -1165,6 +1178,7 @@ static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, > > static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) > > { > > int ret; > > + u32 val; > > > > ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); > > if (ret) { > > @@ -1172,13 +1186,21 @@ static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - pwrap_writel(wrp, (adr >> 1) << 16, PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); > > + if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB)) > > + val = adr; > > + else > > + val = (adr >> 1) << 16; > > + pwrap_writel(wrp, val, PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); > > > > ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > - *rdata = PWRAP_GET_WACS_RDATA(pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA)); > > + if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB)) > > + val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0); > > + else > > + val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA); > > + *rdata = PWRAP_GET_WACS_RDATA(val); > > > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR); > > > > @@ -1228,8 +1250,13 @@ static int pwrap_write16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - pwrap_writel(wrp, (1 << 31) | ((adr >> 1) << 16) | wdata, > > - PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); > > + if (!HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB)) { > > Please switch if's so that we take the else branch on the arbiter not present > case. Or the other way round, just make it uniform, where possible, of course. > Thanks, I will update it in next patch. > > + pwrap_writel(wrp, BIT(31) | ((adr >> 1) << 16) | wdata, > > + PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); > > + } else { > > + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdata, PWRAP_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0); > > + pwrap_writel(wrp, BIT(29) | adr, PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); > > + } > > > > return 0; > > } > > @@ -2022,6 +2049,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > > static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > int ret, irq; > > + u32 mask_done; > > struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > > const struct of_device_id *of_slave_id = NULL; > > @@ -2116,14 +2144,21 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > } > > } > > > > - if (!(pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA) & PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0)) { > > + if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB)) > > + mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1; > > + else > > + mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0; > > + > > + if (!(pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA) & mask_done)) { > > dev_dbg(wrp->dev, "initialization isn't finished\n"); > > ret = -ENODEV; > > goto err_out2; > > } > > > > /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > > - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > > + if (!HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB)) > > + pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > > + > > Whats the connection between an arbiter being present and the watchdog? > Thanks for reviewing. The arbiter capability uses new design of pwrap. This design cannot change the watch dog timer, So I add it here. Is it better to use another capability to define it? > Regards, > Matthias