On 11/24/20, krzk@xxxxxxxxxx <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:39:40PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM krzk@xxxxxxxxxx <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> > > examples:
>> > > - |
>> > > #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> > > @@ -71,3 +81,17 @@ examples:
>> > > wake-gpios = <&gpj0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> > > };
>> > > };
>> > > + # UART example on Raspberry Pi
>> > > + - |
>> > > + &uart0 {
>> > > + status = "okay";
>> > > +
>> > > + s3fwrn82_uart {
>> >
>> > Just "bluetooth" to follow Devicetree specification.
>> Sorry. I don't understand this comment.
>> Could you explain it?
>> Does it mean i need to refer to the net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt?
>
> The node name should be "bluetooth", not "s3fwrn82_uart", because of
> Devicetree naming convention - node names should represent generic class
> of a device.
>
Actually, RN82 is the nfc device.
So, is it okay to use the name as nfc instead of Bluetooth?
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
