On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:50 AM <Cyril.Jean@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11/3/20 6:38 PM, Atish Patra wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:19 AM <Cyril.Jean@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 11/3/20 10:00 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:08 PM Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:58 AM Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> Add initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board having only > >>>>> essential devcies (clocks, sdhci, ethernet, serial, etc). > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + > >>>>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile | 2 + > >>>>> .../microchip/microchip-icicle-kit-a000.dts | 313 ++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> I suggest we split this DTS into two parts: > >>>> 1. SOC (microchip-polarfire.dtsi) > >>>> 2. Board (microchip-icicle-kit-a000.dts) > >>> I also doubt what is the correct board name. I suspect the -a000 comes > >>> from the SiFive board name convention, but does not apply to the > >>> Icicle Kit board. > >>> > >>> @Cyril, please confirm. > >>> > >> Correct. Sorry Padmarao, I missed that one. > >> > > Ok. I picked that one from U-Boot. What should be the correct board > > name in that case ? > > > > microchip-pfsoc-icicle-kit ? > > My preference would go for microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit. I prefer "mpfs" > over "pfsoc" as "mpfs" is the part number prefix for the PolarFire SoC > device family. > Sure. I will update accordingly. Thanks for the quick feedback. > > Regards, > > Cyril. > > -- Regards, Atish
