On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > 17.06.2014 19:12, Lee Jones пишет: > >>From: Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>This avoids leak of IRQ mapping on error paths, and makes it possible > >>to use devm_request_irq() without facing unmap-while-handler-installed > >>issues. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>--- > >> drivers/mfd/max8997.c | 4 +++- > >> drivers/mfd/max8998.c | 4 +++- > >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > >Applied, thanks. > > Hmm... probably it was too early to apply this? I was just going > to prepare v2, based on discussion... Which discussion? > Also, applying only 11/21, without 01/21, will just cause build errors ... CC'ing me on this patch alone when you know you have build dependencies on other patches in the set is a bad idea. Failing to mention that you wanted the patch to be handled in a special and/or unconventional way is an even worse idea. How are you expecting this patch(-set) to be handled? > Confused. Likewise! -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
